2020年4月18日 星期六

「空虛」昇華至「虛空」

近日無意在YouTube找到我非常欣賞的影片——『愛情觀自在』,它原本是舞臺劇,由杜國威先生執筆寫劇本,其後被改編成電影,由趙崇基執導,女主角是陳慧珊,其他演員有吳辰君 、連凱和潘燦良。記得當天看電影時,只覺對白令人細想回味,深藏佛理。
男主角阿修為尋佛理,不顧一切放下工作和女友小靜,前住大嶼山央求他的同學智源大師收他為徒,小靜繼而上山,只想向阿修問過明白,豈料其後小靜竟愛上智源大師,智源大師雖曾受誘惑,最終仍可放下。當中加插阿修和小靜的至友阿正及美娜這一對歡喜寃家,四人同處大嶼山佛寺內,經過智源的點化,小靜有所頓悟,領略如何將「空虛」的感覺,昇華至「虛空」的境界。
 故事中,智源大師從沒有要求阿修、小靜、阿正又或者美娜忘情棄愛,只是從旁協助,令他們更看清楚自己,智源的話充滿禪機,但不是深澀的道理,或許,禪本來就是生活的智慧。現摘錄如下:
『有生就有死,生生死死都係天意,都唔係人所能控制嘅。石子如是,愛情如是,皆憑天意!』
『世間事物都係早有安排,就係佛家所講:一切隨緣。』
『緣喺度,不過,你點樣睇點去決定都會影響「緣」,所以,有姻緣、機緣、良緣、孽緣。』
『「空虛」係感覺,「虛空」至係一種境界。』
『平常一樣窗前月,才有梅花便不同 。』
『「禪」就係生活,佛都要生活。佛知道有愛情!但係唔需要有愛情!』
『修練到最高層次,就係眼睇到嘅「色」,耳聽到嘅「聲」,鼻聞到嘅「味」,身體感覺完全係「假相」。明心見性就知道世間所有都係生滅變異一切無常。最高境界嘅佛同人無分別;著起袈裟唔係即刻等如佛,飲酒食肉唔等於無佛性,又駛乜在乎我鍾意你抑或唔鍾意你吖?』
『佛家嘅「自在」包含無仇、無慮、無怨、無恨,活得自在,愛得自在。』
『一切無常,只求心之所在、心之所安。』
 可算是字字珠璣,是修行者的心血產物。
 同好觀賞後有感:
l   「智源大師也曾講過 " 見山是山, 見水是水, 見山不是山, 見水不是水, 見山仍是山, 見水仍是水 " 人生歷程唔同, 景就自然唔同喇如果明白到 " 覺生於悟, 覺生於自在, 生生了無生生" 就會明白到 "般若心經" 嘅空性並不是全"" 而是不"". 既然不執, "" "嘅時候, 受, 想, 行, 又有分別嗎?
l   「人生苦短,滚滚紅塵,人生自是有情痴,此恨不關風與月,有多少人真真正正能放手、放下、自在?原諒別人,釋放自己,未必人人都可做到,但至少不執着,抽離自己,由第三者角度從新審視自己和身邊人的關係,也許會有新發現和體會。」


4 則留言:

  1. What is ZEN?
    Buddhda is breaking the new ground, he goes beyond the self. No-self, anatta, is your true existence. when you are not, you are. Of course, not in the same form as you have known youself. You are spreading all around cosmos.
    You have to understand the gap between the words, the gaps that human can't be connected, however, there is Buudhda present. In the words he has to use the mind, but when there is gap, that gap shows emptiness, his nothingness and his beyondness.

    回覆刪除
    回覆
    1. 參加禪修, 體會觀自在!

      刪除
  2. Emptiness is not really empty; Emptiness is full of everything. The 'everything'just isn't manifest. It depends on one's experience and knowledge, so not every body can experience Emptiness.

    回覆刪除
  3. Emptiness is the Buddhdist philosophy that all things have no fixed identity or inherent existence and are in a state of change and flux.
    No only are all things constantly changing, but also if any phenomenon is analyzed in enough detail, it is found to exist only in term of it's relation to other things.

    回覆刪除